Showing posts with label bank of america. Show all posts
Showing posts with label bank of america. Show all posts
Monday, May 28, 2012
Borrowers of Bank of America May Have Something to Smile About
Sunday, June 19, 2011
Reverse mortgage Update..Now Bank of America and Wells Fargo Terminate Programs
Several days ago I mentioned that Wells Fargo pulled out of the reverse mortgage market. They will continue to service existing loans, but no longer source new loans. Wells Fargo represented about 25% of the reverse mortgage market.
Bank of America very quietly pulled out of the reverse mortgage market the prior week. Together, Wells Fargo and Bank of America represented a significant 43% of the reverse mortgage market.
Reverse mortgages allow seniors 62 years of age and older to tap into their home equity by allowing the bank to make payments on their home and pay them a monthly stipend. The homeowner is still responsible for property taxes and homeowner’s insurance. However, since lenders cannot assess homeowners’ ability to maintain these two obligations and with property taxes on the rise even as property values fall, BofA and Wells have decided that the gamble is too risky for the banks. Currently between 4 and 5 percent of active reverse mortgages are in technical default, which means they have failed to pay property taxes, insurance or both.
Additionally, when the lender does gain possession of the property upon the death of the homeowner (which usually happens, although the estate does usually get a grace period in which they can pay off the loan), there is no guarantee that the lender will be able to sell the property and recoup the money loaned out – much less make a profit. Greg Gwizdz, a national home sales manager for Wells, cites difficulties gauging home values as a major part of the decision to exit the market.
It is uncertain whether other lenders will follow this trend and terminate their reverse mortgage programs. Logically, Bank of America and Wells Fargo have created an opportunity for other lenders to capitalize on their departure. It is clear that reverse mortgages are viewed as a problem area for lenders and this is unfortunate for those that would benefit by the programs.
Bank of America very quietly pulled out of the reverse mortgage market the prior week. Together, Wells Fargo and Bank of America represented a significant 43% of the reverse mortgage market.
Reverse mortgages allow seniors 62 years of age and older to tap into their home equity by allowing the bank to make payments on their home and pay them a monthly stipend. The homeowner is still responsible for property taxes and homeowner’s insurance. However, since lenders cannot assess homeowners’ ability to maintain these two obligations and with property taxes on the rise even as property values fall, BofA and Wells have decided that the gamble is too risky for the banks. Currently between 4 and 5 percent of active reverse mortgages are in technical default, which means they have failed to pay property taxes, insurance or both.
Additionally, when the lender does gain possession of the property upon the death of the homeowner (which usually happens, although the estate does usually get a grace period in which they can pay off the loan), there is no guarantee that the lender will be able to sell the property and recoup the money loaned out – much less make a profit. Greg Gwizdz, a national home sales manager for Wells, cites difficulties gauging home values as a major part of the decision to exit the market.
It is uncertain whether other lenders will follow this trend and terminate their reverse mortgage programs. Logically, Bank of America and Wells Fargo have created an opportunity for other lenders to capitalize on their departure. It is clear that reverse mortgages are viewed as a problem area for lenders and this is unfortunate for those that would benefit by the programs.
Sunday, April 3, 2011
New Jersey Appoints a Foreclosure Overseer
Last week, a New Jersey judge created a special position for an individual to oversee foreclosure proceedings. Superior Court Judge Richard Williams has been appointed “Foreclosure Overseer,” meaning that he will oversee foreclosure matters in the state and “safeguard the foreclosure process.” The move follows state Supreme Court Chief Justice Stuart Rabner’s December order in which he demanded that major lenders in the state demonstrate why their foreclosure activity in the state should not be suspended in light of “irregular activities” and alleged robo-signing incidents.
The lenders in question – OneWest Bank, BAC Home Loan Servicing, JP Morgan Chase (Chase Home Finance), Wells Fargo Financial New Jersey and CitiResidential Living – all objected to the order. They insisted that they had already reviewed procedures and made improvements before Rabner made his demands. The role of the foreclosure overseer will not be to examine individual cases, but rather to supervise the process itself, looking “at the source of the document creation and ensure that these documents were created by a process that conforms to the law.”
As with every governmental attempt to fix a problem that the private sector is better equipped to handle, some feel that this measure does not go far enough while others believe that it is more governmental intrusion into the private business sector.
The lenders in question – OneWest Bank, BAC Home Loan Servicing, JP Morgan Chase (Chase Home Finance), Wells Fargo Financial New Jersey and CitiResidential Living – all objected to the order. They insisted that they had already reviewed procedures and made improvements before Rabner made his demands. The role of the foreclosure overseer will not be to examine individual cases, but rather to supervise the process itself, looking “at the source of the document creation and ensure that these documents were created by a process that conforms to the law.”
As with every governmental attempt to fix a problem that the private sector is better equipped to handle, some feel that this measure does not go far enough while others believe that it is more governmental intrusion into the private business sector.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)